Research registry

Claim ledger

Claim dispositions and falsifiers generated from the corpus authority.

30 records42 claimsstatus 2026-07-22

Priority records

2

v1 · 2026-07-22

Tarski Coherence

external reviewFormally verified
Question

Which degree-1 Hodge-Tarski statements hold for finite lattices beyond vector spaces?

  • Formally verified

    The degree-1 Hodge-Tarski conjecture is false as stated and admits an exact graph-theoretic characterization in the paper's model.

Falsifier

A countermodel to a manuscript theorem under its stated hypotheses, or a mismatch between a headline statement and the clean Lean build.

v2-draft · 2026-07-22

BABEL v2

active draftConjectural
Question

Do structural signals predict execution failure on independently authored workflows?

  • Conjectural

    No independent workflow evidence currently validates structural signals as predictors of execution failure.

Falsifier

Failure to improve held-out AUROC by 0.05 with a positive bootstrap interval, or failure of the partner gates, ends the predictive claim.

Supporting records

13

draft-2026-07 · 2026-07-22

Compositional Accountability

technical reportEmpirically demonstrated
Question

When do local accountability records compose into one challenge-time account across owners?

  • Empirically demonstrated

    The source-only finite profile computes an exact model-relative query-answerability margin and replayable erasure certificate; it does not assess occurrence truth, non-equivocation, authority, remedy, or external validity.

Falsifier

A differential mismatch, an accepted tampered certificate, a case where control-domain or occurrence binding is ignored, or any public claim promoting the model-relative result to occurrence truth invalidates the profile.

v1 · 2026-07-22

Column-Matroid Backbone

technical reportFormally verified
Question

Which matroid identity underlies the disclosure deficit?

  • Formally verified

    The scoped fee is a column-matroid corank under the paper's construction and hypotheses.

Falsifier

A counterexample under the exact construction and stated hypotheses.

technical reportFormally verified
Question

Which field-independent rank results follow from signed-incidence structure?

  • Formally verified

    The scoped signed-incidence rank results are field-independent under their stated hypotheses.

Falsifier

A counterexample under the paper's exact hypotheses.

technical reportFormally verified
Question

Which numerical invariant follows from the seam-independent disclosure axioms?

  • Formally verified

    Numerical uniqueness over the abstract DoctrineCarrier is machine-checked.

Falsifier

A model satisfying the abstract axioms but violating the checked theorem, or failure of the claimed concrete identification.

v1 · 2026-07-22

SCPI

technical reportFormally verified
Question

How does predicate invention decompose into topological, model-theoretic, and definability gates?

  • Formally verified

    The scoped torsor, counterexample, finite relational descent, and conservativity core is machine-checked within its stated abstractions.

  • Falsified

    Beth.lean machine-verifies semantic Beth definability for sites or extracts an interpolant.

  • Not assessed

    The prose geometric or general Beth-for-sites assembly is established.

Falsifier

A counterexample to the retained formal core under its exact abstractions, or any public surface using Beth.lean as semantic theorem or extractor evidence.

v1 · 2026-07-22

Bridge

technical reportEmpirically demonstrated
Question

Can bilateral validity coexist with failure to specify a coherent bridge?

  • Empirically demonstrated

    On the disclosed hidden-repair study, 14 of 15 classifications matched the predicted repair type exactly, one matched partially, and none missed.

  • Not assessed

    The study independently establishes protected-language non-conservativity, non-definability, or model policy canonization.

Falsifier

Reproduction failure under the disclosed hidden-repair protocol falsifies the retained baseline; the untested Gate 2, Gate 3, and canonization claims receive no positive status.

v1 · 2026-07-22

Seam

technical reportEmpirically demonstrated
Question

Which protocol records local interface claims that do not compose automatically?

  • Empirically demonstrated

    The protocol and tooling are implemented; this does not establish universal safety or recourse.

Falsifier

Failure of the stated implementation tests or an unsupported universal consequence claim.

v8 · 2026-07-22

Bitcoin After Money

technical reportConjectural
Question

Which settlement requirements follow from autonomous coordination without a trusted issuer?

  • Conjectural

    Constitutional argument, not an empirical or formally verified paper.

Falsifier

A demonstrated substitute satisfying the paper's stated settlement requirements.

v1 · 2026-07-22

Coherence Cliff

technical reportEmpirically demonstrated
Question

How do the structural measures scale in the frozen experimental regime?

  • Empirically demonstrated

    Scaling result is limited to the frozen experimental regime.

Falsifier

Reproduction failure on the frozen protocol or a cheap baseline matching the structural method.

technical reportEmpirically demonstrated
Question

Does representation affect access to non-local interface predicates?

  • Empirically demonstrated

    Scoped constructed demonstration, not evidence of population prevalence.

Falsifier

Failure to reproduce the constructed instances.

v1 · 2026-07-22

The Stitching Defect

technical reportEmpirically demonstrated
Question

Which defect appears when two locally analyzed systems are stitched across a boundary?

  • Empirically demonstrated

    Scoped result retained as a technical report.

Falsifier

Reproduction failure under the stated protocol.

v1 · 2026-07-22

The Composition Tax

technical reportEmpirically demonstrated
Question

What does the live proxy report about the cost of semantic composition?

  • Empirically demonstrated

    Applied results are limited to the disclosed proxy, schemas, and trials.

Falsifier

Reproduction failure or a frozen cheap baseline matching the reported result.

technical reportEmpirically demonstrated
Question

Can locally valid interfaces fail to support a globally coherent account?

  • Empirically demonstrated

    Scoped constructed and empirical result only.

Falsifier

Reproduction failure under the stated protocol.

Frontier records

6

draft-2026-07 · 2026-07-22

The Disclosure Deficit

active draftNot assessed
Question

Which fee-family results remain after removing the topology, safety, and prediction claims?

  • Formally verified

    The deficit is a rank difference and a component count, machine-checked and field-independent under the stated hypotheses.

  • Formally verified

    The minimum-disclosure-set count is the product of carrier-component sizes, correcting the published spanning-tree formula.

  • Falsified

    Repair is operationally sparse under integer costs in the stated box.

  • Falsified

    The deficit predicts execution outcomes, or carries a safety or topological reading.

Falsifier

Any included result that depends on cycle necessity, topology branding, execution prediction, or a false repair-basis statement must be removed.

v1-draft · 2026-07-22

SHEAF

active draftConjectural
Question

Does the local-to-global sheaf framework extend to heterogeneous agents?

  • Conjectural

    Heterogeneous-agent extension under development; not load-bearing for the reset.

Falsifier

Counterexamples to the stated conjectures or failure to separate the model from adjacent prior art.

technical reportConjectural
Question

When is compositional incoherence invisible to bounded-radius certification?

  • Conjectural

    Hardness result remains paper-level pending independent review.

Falsifier

A flaw in the reduction or an algorithm violating the stated lower bound.

v0.1-methods-draft · 2026-07-22

The Golden Gate

active draftNot assessed
Question

Can semantic-control systems be evaluated for accepting, refusing, requesting evidence, preserving choice, and abstaining for the correct checkable reason?

  • Empirically demonstrated

    The Golden Gate methods and captive qualification machinery are implemented and reproducible from the disclosed packet.

  • Not assessed

    The system has passed reviewer-originated external evaluation or independent implementation parity.

Falsifier

A custody path that permits author access before submission, a zero-import verifier that depends on Bulla, an unsafe accepted Golden case, or any external-result claim without reviewer-controlled evidence invalidates the method claim.

v0.1-internal-gate · 2026-07-22

Interpolant Envelope

technical reportFormally verified
Question

When can a finite disputed predicate be safely defined in shared vocabulary, partially certified, or disproved by same-reduct countermodels?

  • Formally verified

    In the declared finite FRSL-1 semantics, full definitions, partial RELY and REFUSE regions, and same-reduct non-definability certificates can be independently checked.

Falsifier

An emitted package that passes the standalone checker while violating its finite semantic obligations, a non-definability certificate whose paired expansions do not share the protected reduct, or a mismatch between the Lean statement and executable abstraction blocks the claim.

v0.4-internal-draft · 2026-07-22

No Free Precedent

technical reportFormally verified
Question

Under what explicit reason, authority, scope, closure, and epoch may one forum finding govern a later case?

  • Formally verified

    Case labels on a proper subset do not determine an unseen case absent an explicit hypothesis restriction.

  • Empirically demonstrated

    Authorized precedent compounded on the frozen team-authored planted-rule lineages under bounded-exact closure.

  • Not assessed

    Precedent compounding generalizes to foreign meanings or creates economic value.

Falsifier

A case-only finding that verifies as a general precedent, an application without separate adoption and applicability, same-epoch refusal erasure, stale precedent reuse, or ambient authority invalidates the typed-flow claim.

Historical records

9

v0.1.0 · 2026-07-22

BABEL v1

archivedEmpirically demonstrated
Question

Does the frozen benchmark support reproducible compositional semantic-failure tests?

  • Empirically demonstrated

    The frozen benchmark and its disclosed evaluations remain reproducible within their stated protocol.

  • Falsified

    Internal structural labels establish prediction of real execution failure.

Falsifier

Reproduction failure under the frozen v0.1 protocol falsifies the retained benchmark claim; no execution-prediction claim survives.

withdrawnFalsified
Question

Does a local-to-global disclosure deficit predict adverse execution outcomes?

  • Falsified

    Runtime-failure prediction from fee magnitude.

  • Formally verified

    The audited component-count and omission identities hold under their stated hypotheses.

Falsifier

Not applicable to this historical record.

withdrawnFalsified
Question

Does a hierarchical rank deficit represent hidden convention dimensions and prescribe repair?

  • Falsified

    Historical source only.

Falsifier

Not applicable to this historical record.

withdrawnFalsified
Question

Do spectral invariants determine substitutable disclosure choices and repair bases?

  • Falsified

    Historical source only; valid rank identities may be reused after line-by-line audit.

Falsifier

Not applicable to this historical record.

withdrawnFalsified
Question

Does repair geometry yield sparse operational prescriptions beyond a scalar deficit?

  • Falsified

    Historical source only.

Falsifier

Not applicable to this historical record.

v1 · 2026-07-22

Coherence Types

withdrawnFalsified
Question

Is the proposed coherence calculus sound under its refinement-type discipline?

  • Falsified

    Historical source only.

Falsifier

Not applicable to this historical record.

withdrawnFalsified
Question

Does the spectral-gap trichotomy imply a linear communication bottleneck?

  • Falsified

    Surviving scoped result: random-encoder Procrustes edges have exact Haar marginals and exact adjacent-edge pairwise independence.

Falsifier

A counterexample to conditional Haar-ness or adjacent-edge independence falsifies the surviving lemmas; no spectral claim survives.

archivedConjectural
Question

Does the disclosure deficit extend to a physical resource theory?

  • Conjectural

    Archived during the 90-day reset; no new research family is authorized.

Falsifier

Not applicable to this historical record.

archivedEmpirically demonstrated
Question

Does component-level interpretability recover composition-level semantics?

  • Empirically demonstrated

    In the paper's controlled cyclic-composition regime, edge-local interpretability features did not recover the global structural signal.

  • Not assessed

    The reported result establishes a general boundary for all interpretability systems.

Falsifier

Not applicable to this historical record.